German warning in occupied Poland — "No entrance for Poles! Slavicorigin were not allowed to join some guilds. At first the laws were aimed primarily at Jews but were later extended to "Gypsies, Negroes and their bastard offspring".
What Is Airport Security? The first variety have taken place almost entirely behind the scenes.
|I Can Tolerate Anything Except The Outgroup | Slate Star Codex||This is the most controversial post I have ever written in ten years of blogging. I wrote it because I was very angry at a specific incident.|
|Essay Archive||But the roots of this problem started to appear much earlier.|
|Tim’s Books||The practice of using race as a part of a profile when attempting to identify or curb criminal activity has been used in various ways, including pulling individuals over on highways and questioning airline passengers and individuals at border crossings. Racial profiling has been used to justify finding drug smugglers, terrorists, and undocumented immigrants.|
Comprehensive explosives scanning for checked luggage, for instance, was long overdue and is a welcome addition. There are two fundamental flaws in our approach: The first is a strategy that looks upon every single person who flies — old and young, fit and infirm, domestic and foreign, pilot and passenger — as a potential terrorist.
This is an impossible, unsustainable task in a system of such tremendous volume. As many as two million people fly each and every day in the United States alone. Tough-as-nails prison guards cannot keep knives out of maximum security cell blocks, never mind the idea of guards trying to root out every conceivable weapon at an overcrowded terminal.
The second flaw is our lingering preoccupation with the tactics used by the terrorists on September 11—the huge and tragic irony being that the success of the attacks had almost nothing to do with airport security in the first place.
But conventional wisdom is wrong. It was not a failure of airport security that allowed those men to hatch their takeover scheme. It was, instead, a failure of national security — a breakdown of communication and oversight at the FBI and CIA levels.
What the men actually exploited was a weakness in our mindset — a set of presumptions based on the decades-long track record of hijackings and how they were expected to unfold.
They could have used knives fashioned from plastic, broken bottles wrapped with tape, or any of a thousand other improvised tools. The only weapon that mattered was the intangible one: For a number of reasons, just the opposite is true today. The hijack paradigm was changed forever even before the first of the Twin Towers had fallen to the ground, when the passengers of United 93 realized what was happening and fought back.
The element of surprise was no longer a useful device. In spite of this reality, we are apparently content spending billions of taxpayer dollars and untold hours of labor in a delusional attempt to thwart an attack that has already happened and cannot happen again — guards pawing through our luggage in a hunt for what are effectively harmless items: Not to mention that even a child knows that a lethal implement can be crafted out of virtually anything, from a ballpoint pen to a shattered first class dinner plate.
The folly is much the same with respect to the restrictions on liquids and gels, put in place in following the breakup of a London-based cabal planning to blow up jetliners using liquid explosives.
The threat of liquid explosives does exist.
The latter would go on to mastermind the September 11th attacks, while Yousef was already a wanted man for his role in the World Trade Center prelude.
In Yousef completed a successful test run on a Philippine Airlineskilling a Japanese businessman. The rest of the plot unraveled after a fire in the Manila apartment of one of his accomplices. Scary, but these kinds of explosives are very unstable and cannot be easily transported by hand.
And although certain liquids, when combined under specific conditions, are indeed dangerous, creating those conditions poses huge challenges that, say most experts, would be highly difficult to replicate in an airplane cabin. In the United States, this went on for a full twelve years after September 11th, until finally a program was put in place allowing crewmembers to bypass the normal checkpoint.
That it took twelve years for this to happen is a national embarrassment, especially when you consider that tens of thousands of airport ground workers, from baggage loaders to cabin cleaners and mechanics, were exempt from screening all along.
You read that correctly.
An airline pilot who once flew bombers armed with nuclear weapons was not to be trusted and was marched through the metal detectors, but those who cater the galleys, sling the suitcases, and sweep out the aisles were been able to saunter onto the tarmac unmolested.
The TSA will point out how the privileges granted to tarmac workers have, from the outset, been contingent upon fingerprinting, a ten-year background investigation, crosschecking against terror watch lists, and are additionally subject to random physical checks.
All true, but the background checks for pilots are no less thorough, so why were they excluded? Nobody is implying that the hardworking caterers, baggage handlers, and the rest of the exempted employees out there are terrorists-in-waiting.
Nevertheless, this was a double standard so titanically idiotic that it can hardly be believed. Yet there it was, for longer than a decade. But also, more valuably, it gives us insight into the often dysfunctional thinking of the security state.
And past as prologue: I hoist my luggage onto the belt, then pass through the metal detector. Two of the most exasperating words in air travel, those are. The bag in question turns out to be my roll-aboard. The guard has spotted something inside. The seconds tick by as she waits to confer with her colleague.
All the while, the line behind me grows longer. For some reason, these situations require a sort of football huddle, with lots of whispering and pointing, before the belt can be switched on again.Essay on America Needs Racial Profiling Based Upon Ethnicity and National Origin - Hypothesis: The events of September 11th has caused racial profiling, a practice that was vilified by many years ago, has become a common and accepted practice used by the government, airline officials, police agencies, and the American public.
JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources. While the term racial profiling has only recently come into use, law enforcement agencies have long used race, ethnicity, and national origin as grounds for police action in the United States. During the years of slavery, blacks were not allowed to leave their plantations without passes, and they could be questioned or detained by any white .
Executive summary. In August , a Ferguson, Missouri, policeman shot and killed an unarmed black teenager. Michael Brown’s death and the resulting protests and racial tension brought considerable attention to that town. Segregation. age; racial; religious; sexual; Age of candidacy; Blood purity; Blood quantum; Crime of apartheid; Disabilities.
Jewish; Catholic; Ethnocracy; Ethnopluralism. Civil Rights Argumentative Essay About Same Sex Marriage. This Argumentative essay will discuss the argument of same sex marriage.
The contents are: meaning, brief background and thesis statement for the Introduction; for the Body of the discussion is the counter argument; and for the conclusion part: the summary and the restatement of the thesis statement.