Corporate Profile The twentieth century, especially the past fifty years, has certainly been a time of enormous change. Products have changed, the business of manufacturing and marketing toys has changed and the needs and desires of consumers who buy toys have changed. The story was a major hit.
It is a work reaching toword the new age. It is what one might call a rippling effect.
But far from bring a fable with a moral, it is a tale of dubious moral character. Due to its ambiguity, the ambiguity with which Faust deals with his actions, and the supernatural influence of mephistopheles, can the actions of Faust be judged as clearly immoral?
If Goethe has presented Faust as a pawn in a greater game, surely as in Helenic fashion, the mortal soul is never in jeopardy.
The deal struck with Mephisto cannot be lost. Only if Faust behaves without humanity will his soul be lost. The dual nature of the pact Faust makes with Mephistopheles in Fausts study and the bet which is made between the Lord and Mephistopheles in the prologue in Heaven.
Goethe is a Geman literary hero: The comparison of the Wiemar Faust part one and the Dieter Dorn production clearly reveals the gaping chasam of possible interpretation.
The Weimar production presents Faust as social hero and the Dieter Dorn production presents Faust as a social reprobate. How is this possible? I will attempt to reach the source of this ambiguity which allows such radical interpretation by concentrating my reading on the pact made between the Lord and Mephisto and the Pact made between Faust and Mephistopheles.
And if Faust is to be saved regardless of his actions is there any meaning to be derived from the mystery of being in the context of human experience?
Perhaps then man is not such an entegral part of the Earthspirit. Faust must drink the withces potion and embrace the offerings of Mephistopheles, because of the nature of the bets made with mephisto. The Weimar production presents the world of Faust as one of cosmic harmony and social harmony.
Mephisto sits at the Lords side slightly below him which indicates a hierarchical structure which is uncharictaristic perhaps of the socialist, pantheon approach to cosmic order. The main element of contradiction in this respect is in the set design.
Even the soldiers which are present in the scene at the city gates are removed to give a sense of social harmony. Faust is the hero of this harmonious world where good and evil are all part of the greater simbiotic cosmic order.
The Dieter Dorn production on the other hand produces Mephistopheles with overwhelming theatrics. Mephistopheles breaches into heaven through the floor of the stage, ripping up the floor boads, spouting venemous red light into the serene blue of Heaven.
From the outset of the Dieter Dorn production the world of Faust is seen to be one of cosmic and social chaos. It is a world where the people at the city gate treat Faust wihout an ounce of courtesy; they even transform directly into the witches who turn Faust away from his piety and into a creature of the foulest magnitude.
The forces of good and evil battle over the soul of Faust as he contemplates suicide. Where as in the Weimar production there is no evidence of the physical presence of any force involved in the saving of Faust but Faust himself.
Faust emerges as the hero of his own tragedy. In the Weimar production Faust is hero because he participates unaware in the will of the greater cosmic order and in the Dieter dorn Faust is hero because he participates aware of his position in the greater cosmic chaos. When one looks at the relationship between Faust and Mephisto in the two productions the harmony of the Weimar production and the chaos of the Dieter Dorn production can be seen as two clearly distinct interpretations regarding the nature of the world of Faust.The Nature of Duality in Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde There is the duality of good and evil, right and wrong, joy and despair. There always is the desire to do something which is against the society, against the laws, although this varies from person to person.
More about Man's Duality in R.L. Stevenson's The Strange Case of. Cross Danny Cross Reilly ENGL Writing and Research 10/2/ Good versus Evil The battle between Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a good representation of good versus evil, this battle between good and evil is a very complex and mysterious theme through the entire book. Get an answer for 'Using Stevenson's The Strange Case of Dr.
Jekyll and Mr. Hyde as your basis, discuss the nature of "good" and "evil" or the duality of man's nature, as presented in this novel. Jekyll is the picture of social class and professional excellence, while Mr. Hyde is the embodiment of Jekyll's otherwise hidden evil nature. By distinctly separating these two ironically inextricably combined polar opposites, Stevenson examines man's relationship with good and evil, and comments on the constant war and balance between the two.
The final monologue that Commissioner Gordon brings the themes from Batman Begins to their logical conclusion: Namely, that as a man, Bruce Wayne’s powers to evil crime are rather limited. As a. Human Nature: Good Or Evil? Many things can be said about the gallons of blood, miles of entrails and seemingly endless array of bones, muscles and other fascinating odds and ends that we call our human bodies.