Graff argues educators cannot teach literary analysis without literary theory, and essentially students cannot effectively analyze literature without it. However, in order for educators to effectively implement theory into classrooms, Graff suggests academics need to organize and compartmentalize their departments. Graff looks at the field coverage model and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of implementing it. By letting professors teach independently, the field coverage model allows professors to avoid referring to their academic peers about what and how they are teaching.
You want Shakespeare in half an hour? Or a brief history of the planet? Or humanity in a hundred words? We have it right here. So what is it all about? Since I regarded Eagleton as the Dave Spart of critical gobbledegook, I approached the book with trepidation.
All I can say is that wonders never cease. This is popular philosophy by an amateur in the best sense of the word, a man who clearly loves the stuff and writes plain English.
Eagleton sets off at a cracking pace. God is passed at the first bend. Offering Him up as the meaning of life is either tautological - God is the meaning of life because the meaning of life is God - or it suggests an antiquated architect "widely considered to have a somewhat twisted sense of humour".
With that out of the way by page four, we can link hands with Wittgenstein and approach life as "wonderment". Modern science can tell us, or hope to tell us, how things work. So on we go. Space is inevitably given to linguistic analysis, with much brow-furrowing over the dreaded, "It all depends what you mean by meaning".
Can we, as Nietzsche asked in tackling the question, ever break free of the cultural shackles of our grammar?
At the end of that road "it is even conceivable that not knowing the meaning of life is part of the meaning of life". Nowadays we feel the need to "own" the question. Life is our question and our answer. That is the gulf that divides Odysseus from Hamlet.
Since the great soliloquy, to be or not to be has become my business, not yours. Ask most people what life means to them, or perhaps what "gives it meaning", and the answer will be a melange of family, love, home, sport, nationalism and, again, religion.
Those who once saw their purpose on Earth as fixed by the sages and myths of tribe and community are today adrift on a sea of modernist diversity. If our lives have meaning it is something with which we manage to invest them, not something with which they come ready equipped.
If Eagleton goes a bundle on Arsenal and I on Welsh mountains, so be it. If one person votes for family values, another for world democracy and another for a hundred virgins in heaven, fine.
Just keep them apart and pray to the great god, tolerance. Life is but a walking shadow, but it is my shadow and the brief hour on stage is mine. Eagleton is rightly unhappy with this. He clearly has scores to settle with a number of "postmodernists" eager to strip meaning of meaning.
First into the lists are such pessimists as Schopenhauer, Freud, Conrad and Ibsen, writers who view meaning questions as blank canvases on which to paint their own gloomy view of the world. Any old faith will do to infuse life with significance, for "on this view the meaning of life is a question of the style in which you live it, if not of its actual content".
Schopenhauer viewed "the whole human project as a ghastly mistake that should have been called off long ago". Yet Eagleton requires the answer to his question to confront such nihilism. Its "squalid and farcical" view of human existence forces us "to struggle hard" to make his own slowly apparent optimism seem anything more than anodyne consolation.
By now I am hanging on by my finger tips.
As a cultural historian Eagleton has made a thing of typologies.The essay became a cause célèbre in British literary circles. The Meaning of Life () How to Read a Poem () Trouble with Strangers: A Study of Ethics () Literary Theory, Anniversary Edition () "An Interview with .
Summary of Terry Eagleton’s, The Meaning of Life December 23, Book Reviews-Meaning of Life John Messerly Terence Francis Eagleton ( –) is a British literary theorist widely regarded as Britain’s most influential living literary critic.
In Terry Eagleton wrote an essay on John Bayley in the New Left Review. It is a ritual excoriation of that most tactful of ‘liberal humanist’ critics, punctuated with predictable sneers about ‘a view of life from the Oxford senior common room window’ and how Bayley’s criticism prizes a liberal disorder that depends on a conservative order .
The Life Review Essay is more than just an opportunity to look back at what has lead you to this point in your life it is the very foundation on which all future work (be it, this project, the entire diploma process or the entirety of your future life) rests.
The first, most obvious and easiest target would be Christianity and its various interpretations, that declares God as the all-powerful, all-knowing source of the world’s meaning and its corresponding effect on life itself, and the tenet that deems the world chaotic and meaningless without God.
Free Essay: Life Review Assignment Lutricia Le The University of Texas at Arlington, College of Nursing In partial fulfillment of the requirements of N Home Page; Writing; Life Review Paper; Life Review Paper difference is that a life review takes a further step and helps the older adult recollect past memories by search for meaning.